School Board OKs Teacher Layoffs

The district is now authorized to reduce certified staff by 26 full-time equivalent positions.

For years, Elementary School teacher Lindsay Affleck has been given pink slips — a notification that she might lose her job.

And time after time, she’s been called back to work in the fall, having only days to set up her classroom, she said, while holding back tears at Tuesday night’s school board meeting.

“A lot of people say these cuts won’t affect me,” said Affleck, who noted her hire date might keep her safe this year. “But it affects us all.”

The Newark Board of Education approved a resolution Tuesday night with four ayes that allows for teacher layoffs. Board President Ray Rodriguez was not present.

The resolution allows district officials to reduce the number of certified staff members by the equivalent of 26 full-time positions.

Newark teachers said they are appalled with the board’s approval of the proposed layoffs before the 2012-13 school year.

“We are disgusted with this. They didn’t have to do it,” Newark Teachers Association Co-President Chris Baugh said. “There will be no room to move forward and collaborate [in negotiations] until this issue is resolved.”

Senior Director of Human Resources Tim Erwin said the number of proposed cuts reflects the maximum number of layoffs that could be implemented and that district administrators recommended layoffs based on projected enrollment numbers for the upcoming school year.

“It’s a delicate balance between working with the projected [enrollment] numbers and the assumptions of where we think [enrollment] numbers are going to fall and the reality of where those projected [enrollment] numbers come [to be],” Erwin said.

Continuing declining enrollment and a change to when children are allowed to enter kindergarten were also factors in recommending teacher layoffs, officials said.

Superintendent Dave Marken said the district can’t ignore its declining enrollment.

“What we need to do is turn around the entire picture, begin to build up this community instead of boarding up. Part of the issue is the reality that we have a declining enrollment,” Marken said.

According to the state Department of Education, Newark Unified School District’s enrollment for 2010-11 totaled 6,654 compared with 7,241 five years prior.

Erwin noted the layoff notices are given in order to prevent overstaffing.

Still, teachers and union representatives held a firm stance against the proposed cuts during the meeting.

“We stand with NTA as they stand with us. We stand against further layoffs,” said Mary Gundmann, president of the Newark chapter of the California School Employees Association. “We can’t afford any layoffs.”

NTA leaders said the proposed cuts are unnecessary and that often times, the school district re-hires numerous teachers shortly before or right after a school year begins.

NTA Co-President Bryan Blattel said in the 21 years he’s been employed with the district, there has “never been a case of being overstaffing.”

Instead, Blattel said teachers are often re-hired shortly before the beginning of a school year and that the district often is “scrambling to hire people,” shifting students around to balance enrollment and set up classrooms.

“The problem is making the decision of what’s best for the students, what is best for the community,” Blattel said. “This is not in [their] best interest.

Baugh added that NTA has consistently been willing to work with the school district by taking unpaid furlough days and delaying pay raises.

State education laws require that districts issue preliminary notifications of potential layoffs by March 15 and final notifications must be issued by May 15.

The approved resolution calls for the following reductions:

Particular Kind of Service

Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)

Multiple Subject


Multiple Subject Categorical Intervention


Biological Science (Elementary SRT)


Junior High Math Categorical Intervention


Physical Education


High School Math Categorical Intervention


High School English Categorical Intervention


Secondary Counselor PPS Credential


Secondary Assistant Principal


Single Subject Social Science


Single Subject Chemistry


Single Subject Spanish


Single Subject English




Last May, the district authorized the for the 2011-12 school year, affecting 27 certified employees.

Mona Taplin March 07, 2012 at 06:04 PM
Perhaps Chris Baugh could tell us exactly where the cuts should be made and how we can get around state laws concerning projected enrollment and lay off notice. Maybe he would also explain what impact "furlough days" for teachers has on the students. Isn't it time we took a good look at all the advantages of year round schooling?
Paula Clevenger March 09, 2012 at 06:28 AM
You are forgetting that year round school has several periods of 2 weeks off. How can the parents of Newark afford the childcare for their kids for two weeks? In the summer there are plenty of childcare places at low costs for working parents. Also for a year round school teacher are forced use a weekend to pack up thair classrooms and then have the same weekend to set it up again. A classroom takes more than 2 days to get set up for 32 children.
Tony Doot March 12, 2012 at 02:57 PM
How about laying off 1 or 2 of the chiefs -maybe the ones getting "no confidence" votes from the union locals. How many teachers/classified could be saved with just 1 of their salaries? Maybe the district would not be scrambling - ON THE DAY BEFORE SCHOOL STARTS - to staff their classrooms.
Nadja Adolf March 12, 2012 at 08:38 PM
Guess what? Local recreation programs tend to adapt to the changes in demand. I think Paula, that you need to read about what actually goes on in year around schooling. There are breaks longer than two weeks, and different groups of children are on different cycles through the school year. The objection that parents allegedly want that long summer break is one manufactured by the unions, and encouraged with scare stories suggesting that different children in a family will be o different schedules so the family can't take any vacations. There are several districts in the state that run year around programs; I suggest you look up how they do their scheduling and how it works. It increases building capacity at minimal cost, can be arranged so teachers can continue their continuing education and graduate degree programs, and generally makes life simpler and less hectic for families. As for summer vacations, many more families would rather visit relatives in the cooler season or go snowmobiling, skiing, hunting, or fishing.
Nadja Adolf March 12, 2012 at 08:39 PM
Works for me, Tony. Maybe we should consider unification with Fremont? That would remove a tremendous amount of upper level management for both the district and the city.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »