.
Feedback

City to Seek Services From Allied Waste

The City of Newark is in the process of establishing a 10-year contract with a new garbage and recycling service provider.

Newark is one step closer to parting with Waste Management.

City council voted Thursday to allow city staff to move forward with partnering with Allied Waste for garbage and recycling services for Newark residents.

City staff’s recommendation to contract with Allied Waste comes after a months-long review of services and fees from four companies who applied to provide the city with waste collection services, according to city documents.

The four companies who submitted applications to contract with the City of Newark were: Alameda County Industries, Allied Waste Services, GreenWaste Recovery and Waste Management.

According to Thursday’s agenda, staff suggested the city begin negotiating a contract with Allied Waste because the organization’s “proposal best addresses the requirements” for services and is aligned with priorities community members addressed in a survey about waste and recycling services that was conducted in August and September.

The City of Newark is seeking to establish a 10-year contract with a new waste and recycling collection company, which would begin on June 1, 2013 and last until May 31, 2023.

City documents outline that the overall cost of services from Allied Waste is estimated at $14.5 million. The other companies anticipated overall costs between $16 million and $18 million. The overall cost of Waste Management, which is the company that currently provides collection services to Newark, was projected at $17.4 million.

Allied Waste has 35 years of local experience and currently provides waste services to Fremont and Union City, as well as the City of Piedmont and more than a dozen cities in Contra Costa and Santa Clara counties.   

If negotiations with Allied Waste stall, city staff plan to seek a contract with GreenWaste Recovery, whose overall cost is projected to be $16 million.

The search for a new provider came after the city’s contract with Waste Management of Alameda County expired.

City council decided to extend the franchise agreement it has with Waste Management for one year in February. Waste Management’s new one-year contract includes a rate increase of approximately 24 percent that became effective on June 1, according to previous city documents.

The fee hike means an increase of a little more than $5 for typical 35-gallon residential service and an increase of about $54 for an average commercial 3-yard bin.

A final agreement is scheduled to be presented and voted on in December.

Also at the city council meeting:

  • Retired Newark Police Cmdr. Tom Milner was commended by Mayor Al Nagy. Milner served the Newark Police Department for 10 years. Also recognized during presentations were Newark Days committee members and the winners of the Silliman Activity and Family Aquatic Center’s Recycling Poster Design Contest.

For more information about city council meetings, visit http://www.newark.org.

What do you think of Newark's plan to seek services from Allied Waste? Do you think the service fees from Waste Management are too high or are they reasonable? Share your thoughts in our comments section below.

------
Like Newark Patch  | Follow Newark Patch | Blog on Patch | Get Free Patch Newsletters

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newark Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nick May 23, 2013 at 10:47 am
There's been some construction going on at the north end of Lake Blvd, just before the freewayRead More overpass leading into Ardenwood Park. That's been going on for about the last 7-8 business days.
Jack Lyness May 22, 2013 at 06:29 pm
Today PG&E told me that about 3,000 customers (homes and businesses) in Newark and Fremont wereRead More without power from 7:57 p.m. to about 11 p.m. (I think ours went out a few minutes before that and I'm sure ours came on before 9 p.m. I suppose maybe some of those 3000 folks were out longer as they brought neighborhoods back up gradually, but my guess is that some bureaucrat guessed at the beginning that the outage "should" last 3 hours, and that became historical "fact.") due to a "device failure." (Now that's informative. My guess remains that wind was involved.) They called and left a message on my Comcast voice mail to let me know the power was out and that it should be back on by 11 - but my phones require power so I didn't get the message until this morning. I just called PG&E to change the number they call with such notifications to my cell, but they were able to clarify nothing else. Anyway, in case you were wondering, that is what PG&E now says happened.
Jill UyBico May 22, 2013 at 02:08 pm
I definitely rushed right into the shower when the power went out to avoid the dark! Apparently allRead More the traffic lights were out in the areas you mentioned, as well as the Central/Blacow traffic lights. I wish I knew what happened, I should probably check that out right now. I saw a cop car and fire truck a few houses down on my street.
He will probably be scared at first but he comes for food
James Nelson May 21, 2013 at 12:27 pm
Did you check the local Vietnamese Restaurants? Hope he's OK.
Zoneil Maharaj (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 11:27 am
Thanks for sharing this Diana. Has he been found?
Adam Moe May 20, 2013 at 11:40 am
I remember as a teacher buying my own supplies. Looking back I don't regret buying anything andRead More realize that each person's teaching style is different. The things I might buy for my classroom would be totally different than you. Running a classroom is a lot like running a business, there are expenses and you just have to deal with that.
John Angelo May 21, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Good to know. Thanks, Nika!
Nika Megino (Editor) May 21, 2013 at 01:24 pm
It's definitely a great photo! We didn't anticipate it to stretch like that. We'll change itRead More eventually, but your friend should have enough time to check it out, John.
John Angelo May 21, 2013 at 12:50 pm
James, I completely understand and agree. The image is stretched beyond the dimensions it was meantRead More to be viewed, but it was a pleasant surprise to see the photo at the top of the page! I hope it stays up for at least another day so my friend can see it. Thanks for your reply.
Birgitta Bower May 18, 2013 at 10:14 pm
One story I tried to read had an ad covering 1/4 of it, and there was no way to make it go away.
Daniel May 17, 2013 at 05:17 pm
Don't like it at all. "Change" isn't always for the better.
Shimadog May 16, 2013 at 06:02 am
More difficult to navigate.
Debora Killeen January 23, 2013 at 05:07 pm
You are beautiful and will never be forgotten! God had a plan for you Charlotte and these greatRead More people are making that happen right here now as you oversee above its great impact on those of us left behind here on earth. God Bless You! Debora